Anaklusmos
Reactions
Comments
-
Your whole premise is riddled with holes.
People have managed to kill smobs as they're currently designed. The design of smobs is not the problem. The lack of people is.
And population problems will continue to persist s… -
Your assumption is that people leave because they can't go around killing smobs.
That is incredibly misleading, if not entirely wrong.
People have left because they've faced their smobs being constantly slain, plus the opposing… -
It's not sarcasm, it's a response to the question: why does the OP feel like their org smobs are pointless and therefore need this revamp?
-
Do fleshpots and spheres still lose all their flesh/facets when they die? I've always thought that was way more devastating than DL/Sup pacts.
-
Nope
-
(Quote) Here's the thing. If a quest carries so much baggage that the consequences of doing it far outweighs the reward, then it should be deleted because it's never going to be done, anyway. It's unnecessary bloatware for Lusternia.(Quote)
If people did have to camp out quests to police them, then sure. Disrupting quests should be a valid recourse.
But no. Because QUEST RANKINGS and whatever you're proposing would exist. So not only is it easy to…@Orael When I say "synergy", I mean it very broadly.
And vitals synergy (which is what Glom has; mana) will always trump affs synergy (everyone else). So…Up the rewards before you slap any more punishment to questing.(Quote) Why else would you want to discover who did what quest, if not to formulate some sort of consequence for that person?
Granted, in other IREs, people are rewarded by their cities for completing certain quests. But that's not…(Quote) I'm 100% dismissive of people who support the status quo when the status quo is broken.haha, even easier than QUEST RANKINGS? Might as well make it so that denizens shout out whenever someone starts doing quests, then.Haha. Here's the thing:
Glomdoring, which is widely considered to have the superior skill sets, gets buffs, needed or not. They get the admin attention to fix their boo-boos.
I don't see that happening to other orgs. Institute …I'm not namedropping people who stalk quests; I'm listing names of people who have done particularly controversial quests, in order to point out that this was already possible pre-quest rankings. Your agreement or support isn't necessary, in Tweets VIII: Knocks Me Off My Tweet Comment by Anaklusmos March 2019(Quote) There is discoverable, and there is discoverable.
There were no QUEST RANKINGS back in the days of hai'Gloh Zemordia and yet we still know the key players. Everiine, Narsrim, Talan, Xenthos. Part of the fun of that whole er…(Quote) If the second part is true then they just wasted credits/dbs/whatever currency.
(Quote) If you want to impose punishments and consequences on actions, then you should also have to put in the leg work of actually catching the act that merits the aforementioned punishments and consequences. ie sit there and keep watch, if…(Quote) Any post or thread that criticizes Glom is already unproductive, anyway, since nothing would really be done to dislodge their totally balanced skills.
in Fighting Shadowdancers
Comment by Anaklusmos
March 2019
All of that is pointless and needlessly complicated as long as QUEST RANKINGS exists.(Quote) There's generally a risk attached to any attempt to uncover details like that, though. And a chance to fail.
QUEST RANKINGS has neither.Don't call them dailycredits because itrefers to the RL dayOmniscience on all quests plus harsher punishments? Might as well delete the quests since they would never get done(Quote) It is boring because all you need to do to police it is to check a log
Honestly, the QUEST <quest> RANKINGS is the worst because it makes it trivially easy to spot anyone who may be doing a controversial quest (eafs). Delete pls.Petition to make mechanics discussions acceptable IC, to lessen the artificial need for separate OOC channels.It's okay, Lusternia can afford to lose players and therefore dismiss and deny the reasons why players leave.
Haha, nothing here really counteracts the "sub-Glom" notion when you hear Gaudi.(Quote) I'm older and from a time where leaders serve their constituents and not some foreign power.
But your dust affsLOVE the Glom loyalty from the (ex)-CL of Gaudiguch
(c) Iron Realms Entertainment 2012.