Ealix
Reactions
Comments
-
(Quote) For the moment, we are going to stick with a maximum of three. The intent here is we can balance conflict around what has been the norm in recent years, and then once we have the balancing stuff worked out, we can reconsider changing …
-
Okay, I've had my bit of a break.Below is going to be my new proposal. As of the time of posting the proposal, I am not going to look at the forums thread or the Discord thread for a day or two to give you time to process it and ask …Okay, so here is what is going to happen.
Because I have a rather busy start to my work week and I want to work through this with the player base properly, I am going to take a few days and not touch the alliance system stuff at all so t…Firstly, thank you for the input. I am not going to speak to anything outside of the Alliance system within this thread, as this is what the purpose is here. Any further comments on the thread outside of the Alliance system are not…
I'm going to reiterate again, this is a proposal. I have not once said 'this is how it is happening, too bad.'
The purpose of this was for feedback, nothing more, preferably in a positive manner.
In relation to some questions:<…We have had some more discussions and we will leave Manse Privacy rooms as they are for the time being.
However, we will continue to observe and monitor how these rooms are used, and if they are being used by a portion of the playerbase f…(Quote) On re-reading, yes you are correct. I misread the portion of the code for that. My apologies.
I'll take all this feedback back up to the team and see what the verdict is from there.
(Quote) Even now, it is impossible for some players to be truly hidden regardless. Guild leaders and city leaders, even if hidden completely from the WHO list as they are now, will still show up on the respective HELP file for the guild/city/…We have had a bit of discussion about Manse Privacy Gems and want to propose the following changes:
- Manse Privacy Gems will still show people on WHO but as (cloaked location) like I mentioned above. They will still stop people from bein…(Quote) If there is enough support to keep the [PLANE] in we can keep it for sure.
As for Chameleon Tattoo, that is something we'd need to look at completely separate to this.(Quote) The main reason for removing the PLANE at the end of EWHO (at least in my opinion) is the assumed knowledge by the playerbase once they reach that point of the game where they can start buying artifacts like this one. It feels to me t…(Quote) The basic idea is that having a Gem of Cloaking in their inventory or being in a manse room with a Manse Privacy Artifact will show (cloaked location).
The active ability that you can use five times per real life day will p…(Quote) With regards to Cloaking gems and off plane, the (cloaked location) will always take precedence over anything else. So even if you are off-plane you will still show as being in a cloaked location.(Quote) The example WHO list shown above assumes third-eye, so you will still only see the room name of those who do not have gems.
I have edited the post to reflect that it is an example with Third-Eye.(Quote) Manse privacy artifacts will be treated as being a cloaked location.
(c) Iron Realms Entertainment 2012.