I've accepted my inevitable lynching at this stage. I have an inherently suspicious role and can't bring any info to the table, since I don't target people.
Reasoning: Original gut instinct, to get clarity on number of killers, and unless Lavinya also comes out saying she's non-Elder, his is the most anomalous roleclaim.
Haha, while it is annoying, I do admire your consistency.
But, that reaction just makes me even more sceptical of your claim. If you had a suspicion for why Vivet wasn't Town, you should be able to articulate why.
I'm not alert enough to get into full defence mode, but there are so many other reasons Vivet could have chosen not to lynch me. Two off the top of a groggy head are
Knowing I'd flip Town lets her avoid bandwagon suspicion.
Question asked, is it important for Town to know the number of kills?
(Quote)
Page 9 quote: If Portius is telling the truth, at this point he knows Town could lose 3 people/night.
I'd like everyone to go back and read what I called the flag-raising post again.
If Portius knew exactly what caused the two Soulless to attack each other, what the hell is up with his quasi-theory about possibly gaining the loser's power…
Call it willful misinterpretation if you like, but my understanding is simply that if you lose an immunity, it means you were attacked. You claim you lost two immunities and thus, that you were attacked twice.
I'll admit, I'm acting in my own self-interest pushing this lynch, since otherwise the default lynch comes back to me, but you claim you tanked two attacks blowing two of your limited immunities. Now it's they attacked each other?
(Quote)
Flag-raising post. Page 12 to see in context.
While he's not the first person to suggest that one of the Soulless is a SK, I think he is the first to suggest they all are. Everyone else is postulating busdrivers etc. …