I've decided I have a better articulation of all that, if you want the tl:dr not to be taken as a precedent That's the bad part. If a ruling does not set a precedent, then you can reject Book A for i… (View Post)
I'm going to poke at this more because I really, really don't understand this. Seriously, this is straight from the book. Emphasis mine. "It should be emphasized, however, that these th… (View Post)
I think we are arguing over two distinct issues here and they are blending together. Leaving aside the merit of pulling any specific book, I think this is the crux of the issue regarding rule clarity… (View Post)
Re: pulling books, there was some conflict over it ages ago and there was a promise of producing actual content guidelines to prevent surprise rejections for being inappropriate. Never materialized. (View Post)